Science, Policy and Laws to prevent
the < font color="#BD1622">killingof wolves in Europe

19 February 2025
WOLF DOWNLISTING NOW CHALLENGED AT THE EUROPEAN COURT.

THE LEGAL APPEAL PROCESS BEFORE THE GENERAL COURT OF THE EUROPEAN
UNION HAS NOW BEEN ACCEPTED

Press Release English

Press Release Italian

Press Release French

31st January 2025
17 December 2024
Five NGOs submit an appeal before the European Court of Justice against ...

Five NGOs submit an appeal before
the European Court of Justice against the European Commission for violating various principles of international law in proposing the downlisting of the wolf under the Bern Convention

More information

 

1st November 2024
Sub Label
Science for Wolve

On 1st November, ‘Science for Wolves’ a concerned group of experts, launched two scientific statements to support the case for wolf protection. One outlined the case in the context of species recovery and the second outlined the case in the context of ecological recovery. The result was the collection of 693 signatures from scientists and experts. Green Impact hosted the initiative online. The Statements were sent to the  Secretary General of the Bern Convention on 1st December 2024. 

“Is the EU letting politics decide over science when it comes to conservation policy? We invite you to object to this decision.”

By signing these two scientific statements for wolves, hundreds of scientists urged the Secretary General of the Bern Convention not to allow a decision regarding the delisting of wolves at the forthcoming December 2024 meeting, since such a decision would not be based on science, due to the inherent lack of scientific evidence.

 (link scientific statements )

Despite this plea for scientific consideration and democracy, the deslisting went ahead.

November 2024
Collectif des Associations pour la Protection du Loup en France

 

Novembre 2024, Mobilisation contre la révision du statut du loup. PETITION: Sacrifier le loup s’inscrit dans une réaction antiécologique profonde.

L’Union européenne vient d’accueillir favorablement, le 25 septembre, la proposition faite en 2023 par la présidente de la Commission européenne, Ursula von der Leyen, de réviser le statut de protection des loups en Europe, sans doute pour calmer un monde agricole. Nous appelons expressément les élus français et européens au maintien du classement du loup en espèce strictement protégée, car il est plus que jamais vital de sauvegarder et d’améliorer les dispositifs réglementaires permettant de lutter contre l’appauvrissement de la biosphère. Il est temps de faire la paix avec la nature.

Read More and Sign

2024 – 2025
Scientists urge EU Policy - Makers to reinstate the GREEN DEAL

 

May 2024 . Declaration promoted by European Scientific Associations and signed by scientists ( 2000+ signatures at 14.01.2025)  criticising  the European decision-makers for a series of decisions that undermine the EU’s environmental agenda and international obligations, resulting in an overall attack on the Green Deal, on nature, and the future of EU citizens. The European Green Deal, in its original form, was poised to set ambitious steps for tackling these crises and addressing key societal challenges. However, the Green Deal is presently going through a continuous path of weakening, as elements of it are being lost or replaced in the policy process. As scientists, we are particularly concerned about a series of unjustified, poorly informed and rushed deregulations which fail to align with the dire need for transformative changes toward sustainability.

Read More and Sign the declaration

26 November 2024
Open Letter

 

Mr Alain Berset, Secretary General of the Council of Europe; Mr Mikaël Poutiers, Secretary of the Bern Convention

The EU Proposal on Wolf downlisting is unlawful and therefore unfit for being voted at the 2024 December, Standing Committee meeting of the Bern Convention.

The Proposal of the European Union (EU), initiated by the European Commission[1], to downgrade the conservation status of wolves is widely regarded as unlawful, lacking scientific justification, and violating principles of democratic participation and rule of law in policymaking. Consequently, it should not be considered for a vote at the Standing Committee Meeting of the Bern Convention in December 2024. Given the current circumstances, a reputational risk for the Bern Convention could arise if a vote allowed.

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6752

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_4330

28 October 2024
Sub Label
European Ombudsman opens an investigation into...

European Ombudsman opens an investigation into the European Commission’s downgrading of the wolf’s protection status following a request lodged by environmental law non-profit ClientEarth in February 2024

More Information

18 November 2024
Letter of several NGOs including AVAAZ, EEB and Eurogroup for Animals to the Bern Convention National Focal Points calling for rejecting the EU Proposal

The European Union proposal to lower the protection status of the wolf is clearly a politically motivated U-turn away from an ambitious and science-based approach to species and ecosystems conservation. Indeed, the Parties to the Convention have rejected similar proposals to de-list the wolf in the Bern Convention meetings in 2006, 2018 and 2022 based on the absence of scientific evidence to alter this species’ protection status. There is still no scientific justification for it now, as shown also in the Commission’s in-depth assessment of the situation of the wolf in the EU published in December 2023.

Read The Letter

May 2024
Letter of multiple organisations including EEB, Birdlife, Eurogroup for Animals addressed to the EU Ambassadors asking to reject the Commission’s proposal to weaken wolf protection.

 

Dear Ambassadors , we strongly urge you to reject the European Commission proposal to lower the protection status of the wolf under the Bern Convention at

your upcoming meeting. This will send a clear signal that the EU takes its domestic and international commitments to protect and restore biodiversity seriously, on the basis of science-based policy making. The Commission’s proposal for the Council Decision to lower the protection status of the wolf is clearly a politically motivated U-turn.

Read The Letter

Retour en haut